|
Slumberjack Cot Black / Olive | 
 enlarge
| Brand: Slumberjack
Buy New: $68.95 - $141.00
Ramsey Outdoor  1252 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
The Sportsman's Guide  8727 reviews
Usually ships in 1-3 weeks
Fogdog 19274 reviews
Usually ships in 6-10 business days
Rating: 37 reviews
Media: Misc.
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
UPC: 034179029234
EAN: 0034179029234
ASIN: B000EXQAYS
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Slumberjack Cots... all about roominess and comfort! Extra wide and extra long rest areas make these Cots exceptionally comfortable. Anti-squeak, durable construction allows you, and your campmates, to enjoy a quiet nights of rest for years to come. Cot is made with durable 300 x 600-denier poly fabric over "no squeak" aluminum frame and steel end bars. Includes a mesh gear pocket that hangs below the Cot to keep your glasses, watch or flashlight safe and close by. Slumberjack Cots come in 3 styles. Here are the details on each: Big Cot measures 2'8" x 6'10" x 1'7" and has a 325 lb. weight capacity. Big XL Cot measures 3'4" x 7'2" x 1'8" and has a 325 lb. weight capacity. Big Lux Cot includes a self-inflating, edge-bonded mat that slides into a sleeve in the rest area for additional warmth and comfort. Measures 2'8" x 6'10" x 1'7" and has a 325 lb. weight capacity. Choose Size from these 3 models. Order your favorite today! Slumberjack Cot, Black / Olive
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 10 more reviews...
great cot January 2, 2009
Capital One
I use this cot 4 to 5 days a week.Iam 6ft and 230 lbs and have not had one problem.I own this cot for 13 months and still going strong I highly recomend it
 Not Army Tough July 25, 2008
Paul T. Thompson (Kalamazoo, MI)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Just got this cot yesterday, and I have mixed feelings about it. The length and width are great, but I have serious concerns about the construction. Anyone who has slept on a military issue cot of this style (I slept on one in Iraq for 11 months) knows they are built like rocks. But this cot wobbles forward and backward in a very disconcerting way. The brackets on the joints are undersized, and I think that is what leads to the instability. Secondly, the connectors for the endpoles are of a style (kinda like a dovetail joint) that is very likely to break during normal use (assembly and disassembly in particular). Army cots have a much better ball and socket type joint between the side and end poles. Lastly, this sucker is HEAVY. I'm talking like four or five times what it should weigh. Which makes me boggle even more at the wobbliness of it.
Overall, I think the poles are well constructed, but the joints are weak. Maybe a redesign is in order. But if you're careful not to put any forward/backward stress on the cot, I think it ought to hold out for a while. I'm 6' tall, so I've always hated the old 75" army cots for being too short for me (head and heals hit the end poles), but I'm going to return the slumberjack and get one of the issue cots instead. Proof that there is a reason that the army buys what it buys.
cot July 8, 2008
george elliot (mn, usa)
this cot appears to be sturdy. i padded it with numerous quilts and y guests have said that it is very comfortable.
 Well made! June 30, 2008
Forest Camper
This cot is very well made and solid. No squeaks when you turn over. The only dissapointment I have is the fact that assembly could be easier. When you assemble the last end rail it is a struggle to streach the fabric enough to lock in the end bar. Hopefully the fabric relaxes over time to make set up easier. As far as quality.......excellent!
Why did I wait so long? June 28, 2008
Bernard N. Taverne (Bellevue, WA)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
We are early seventies and sleeping on air mattresses, though comfortable makes it hard to get up, nothing to support you. So I decided on cots, which I should have done long ago. These cots by Slumberjack are wonderful; old-fashioned durability, easy to set up, though I have to use the handle of my hammer as a prybar to get the last part of the end bar to engage the post on the runner, however, for younger men this should not be needed. I have used these now twice while the nights were still fairly cold and I found it more comfortable to use a foam bedroll under me to provide better protection from the cold from below. Best of all, my wife now likes camping again.
|
|
|
| |
